What the European election means for health care

February 18, 2020 Off By EveAim

A woman shows her finger nails colored in the European colours in front of the European Parliament building in Brussels, Belgium | Oliver Hoslet/EPA-EFE

PRO ARTICLE

What the European election means for health care

Green MEPs could use their success to push for more EU action on health.

By

5/27/19, 6:17 PM CET

Updated 5/29/19, 4:37 AM CET

The European Parliament election is sure to shake up health care issues as newly elected MEPs jockey for positions following the departure of some key members.

While some familiar faces are sticking around, there’s a notable vacuum when it comes to one of the most controversial files that will carry over to the next Parliament — health technology assessment legislation — as many of the rapporteurs are now gone.

An influx of Green party candidates will likely ramp up pressure on industry, including pharmaceutical and chemicals manufacturers, and also ensure stronger ties between environmental and health issues.

MEPs will elect a new Parliament president and confirm the committees at the first plenary sitting scheduled to begin July 2. The committees will hold their first meetings in July, when they’ll elect their chairs and vice-chairs.

Romanian European People’s Party MEP Adina-Ioana Vălean, the most recent chair of the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety Committee (ENVI), is returning to Parliament.

Here are our four takeaways for health:

1. Greens want EU to do more on health

Big Pharma and Big Chem better watch out. With Green parties picking up at least 15 more seats, they’re going to have greater strength in numbers when pushing their environment and public health agenda, which they believe the current European Commission is not delivering on.

“DG SANTE is not sufficiently standing up against the pharmaceutical industry, industrial farming, and the chemical sector,” Dutch MEP Bas Eickhout, Greens co-candidate for Commission president, said in an emailed statement.

That’s good news for health care groups, which in their manifestos to candidates asked for a bigger EU role in health, including the possibility of a Commission vice president for health in all policies. Eickhout said he thought a VP for health “makes sense,” as long as the job came with concrete policies rather than just a title. The Commission should have a bigger role in many issues, including “protecting patients, stimulating research, making sure medicines have an added value and are affordable, aligning trade and health policy, and ensuring that products are safe,” he said.

Commission Secretary-General Martin Selmayr said at a POLITICO event on Monday he “would expect the ‘green wave’ will have a strong impact on the program of the next European Commission president.”

It’s worth noting though that while the Greens made gains in Western European countries, such as Germany, France, Finland and Luxembourg, they didn’t win any seats in Southern or Eastern Europe.

One new face in the Greens sure to be heavily involved in health care issues is Belgian MEP Petra De Sutter, a former senator in Belgium’s parliament and a physician who runs the department for reproductive medicine at Ghent University. De Sutter told POLITICO she’d be interested to serve on the parliamentary committees for health and justice following her election Sunday night, particularly on issues related to endocrine disruptors and female genital mutilation.

2. HTA needs a new shepherd

One of the Parliament’s trickiest health files needs a new leader.

The elections saw a mass exodus — both by choice and by chance — of the rapporteurs of the health technology assessment legislation.

Lead rapporteur Spanish Socialist MEP Soledad Cabezón Ruiz wasn’t on her party’s list this time around and European People’s Party shadow rapporteur French MEP Françoise Grossetête and ALDE shadow rapporteur German MEP Gesine Meißner both called it quits. Belgian ALDE MEP Lieve Wierinck, who led the opinion for the Industry, Research and Energy Committee, wasn’t reelected.

The Green’s shadow rapporteur Michèle Rivasi, from France, declared a win Sunday amid her party’s success. And it looks like Romanian European People’s Party MEP Cristian-Silviu Bușoi, who led the HTA opinion for the Internal Market and Consumer Protection Committee, will eek out a win. He was No. 9 on the National Liberal Party (PNL) list in Romania and provisional results predict they will win 10 seats.

German EPP MEP Peter Liese was also reelected. A vocal proponent of EU-level HTA, Liese may try to take up the mantle for his party.

3. Medical device champions remain

Many of the MEPs who worked on the new medical device regulations last session are returning, including Liese who was co-rapporteur on the file.

While the new rules were agreed in 2017, some MEPs and Council representatives have suggested the Commission has been dragging its feet on implementation and hasn’t done enough to ensure readiness as the 2020 deadline looms. Industry has been sounding the alarm as there are only two notified bodies ready to ensure the quality of devices under the new regulation, but the Commission denies the need for a Plan B.

Industry can be confident there will be MEPs to keep up the pressure on the Commission, including Irish EPP MEP Mairead McGuinness, who has pledged to run for Parliament president.

But others, such as Croatian socialist MEP Biljana Borzan have signaled that they don’t see this as purely a Commission problem and the industry needs to step up efforts. “I think that everyone had enough time to prepare,” Borzan said last year. “Of course, industry will try to say anything to postpone the implementation.”

A physician by training, Borzan is sticking around to help shepherd the new rules for in-vitro diagnostics, which go into effect in 2022.

4. Stalwarts saying goodbye

Several health policy focused MEPs either voluntarily retired or will be forced into retirement after they failed to gain enough support for their reelection bids.

That list includes two cancer survivors who used their personal experiences to advocate for more funding and action for cancer on the EU-level: Slovenian EPP MEP Alojz Peterle and Belgian ALDE MEP Wierinck.

Peterle, a former prime minister of Slovenia, was president of the MEPs Against Cancer Group. Aside from HTA, Wierinck worked on issues such as antimicrobial resistance and research funding.

Portuguese EPP MEP José Inácio Faria, who was active on health issues including cancer, drug prices and medicines shortages, won’t be returning as his party failed to win enough votes for a seat.

Czech socialist MEP Pavel Poc, a vice-chair of the ENVI committee heavily involved in the debate regarding the regulation of chemicals that can disrupt hormone systems, also lost his reelection bid.

Sarah Wheaton, Jillian Deutsch and Hanne Cokelaere contributed reporting.

Authors:
Katie Jennings